-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.5k
doc: clarify status of feature request issues #61505
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Review requested:
|
| have the ability to direct resources toward specific work. The | ||
| features which are implemented are those for which volunteers | ||
| are individually motivated to work on. The best way to ensure | ||
| Feature requests are not a valuable source of input for the project. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| Feature requests are not a valuable source of input for the project. | |
| Feature requests have a relatively limited value as a source of input for the project. |
Tones down the message a little, whilst still discouraging feature requests as primary sources of input.
| It is usually more productive to first send the Pull Request implementing the | ||
| feature, even imperfectly, and let the discussion happen during code review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| It is usually more productive to first send the Pull Request implementing the | |
| feature, even imperfectly, and let the discussion happen during code review. | |
| It is usually more productive to first send a Pull Request implementing a | |
| feature, even imperfectly, and let the discussion happen during code review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What if the implemented feature is what you really don't want to, which will end up with great-pains-but-all-in-vain?
The discussion in #61487 made me realize we lack a statement saying "you don't need to open an issue, actually we'd prefer if you open a PR directly if you already know what you want". In fact, we were kinda hinting the opposite, which does not reflect the reality of the issue tracker in my experience, resulting in frustrating experience for both reporters and triagers.